Andrea Mitchell’s focus on Harris’ Black men voter problem ignores a similar white women problem.

The media’s hyperventilation of Trump getting a few more Black & Latino voters ignores a more profound problem with some white women voters.

---

Andrea Mitchell: Focus on both black men and white women.

Podcasts (Video — Audio)

---

Summary

The video discusses Andrea Mitchell’s focus on Vice President Kamala Harris’s perceived issue with Black male voter support, highlighting a double standard in media coverage. The conversation critiques the emphasis on Black men as a potential weak spot for Harris while failing to address a similar voting trend among white women, who have shown significant support for Donald Trump despite his regressive policies. The broader issue is framed as a problem with media narratives that disproportionately scrutinize minority voters instead of equally considering the voting behavior of all demographics.

• Andrea Mitchell raises concerns about a slight decline in Black male voter support for Harris, framing it as a potential risk to her campaign.

• Harris’s surrogates push back, noting that Black men remain one of the most reliable Democratic voting blocs despite slight shifts.

• The discussion critiques the lack of equivalent media scrutiny on white women, who continue to support Trump at significant levels despite their stated preferences on women’s rights.

• The video calls for a more balanced analysis of voter behavior, highlighting the double standard in how minority and majority voting trends are covered.

• Economic issues under the Biden administration are touched upon, emphasizing providing context for inflation and economic policies that are often misrepresented in the media.

The discussion reveals a media bias that disproportionately scrutinizes Black voters while neglecting to hold white women accountable for their voting patterns. This imbalance shifts focus away from more significant electoral dynamics, such as why a demographic with considerable influence supports candidates who do not prioritize their interests. A progressive approach would demand more equitable coverage that holds all voters to account, focusing on systemic issues and policy impacts rather than perpetuating racialized narratives.

Please subscribe for the much more in-depth article.

We are grateful to all of our subscribers. Paid subscribers, however, are extremely important for us in getting the job done. Misinformation funded by the deep pockets of the Right Wing and our Oligarchy flood the internet. We are using all our platforms on-air, online, and in publications to counter that. We ask that you invest the equivalent of less than a coffee to ensure we can keep doing this effectively. Paid subscribers can read our current and subsequent books on this platform for free. We need 300 new paid subscriptions to meet monthly goals! Please make a difference.

---