Andrew Kreig, Justice Integrity Project Editor on how the new ‘Lawfare’ and Project 2025 hurt you.

Justice Integrity Project Editor Andrew Kreig discusses how the New ‘Lawfare’ and planned Project 2025 hurt you. He exposes the dangers of Trump and MAGA.

NOTE: We need 300 new paid subscriptions to meet October’s goal! Please make a difference.

We are grateful for our Paid Subscribers and Free Subscribers. In this political climate, we need several hundred more Paid Subscribers. Misinformation funded by the deep pockets of our Oligarchy floods the internet. We are using all our platforms on-air, online, and in publications to counter that. We ask that you invest the equivalent of less than a coffee to ensure we can keep doing this effectively. Please invest in a Democracy that serves all of us by becoming a paid subscriber. It comes with many benefits.

Andrew Kreig, Justice Integrity Project Editor on Lawfare * Project 2025

Podcasts (Video — Audio)

---

Summary

Andrew Kreig, Justice Integrity Project editor, discusses the dangers of politically motivated prosecutions or “lawfare” and the radical implications of Project 2025 with Politics Done Right. Kreig, a seasoned journalist and attorney, critiques the manipulation of the justice system to target political opponents, warning that Project 2025 could bring even more severe authoritarian tactics under a conservative administration. Kreig stresses the urgent need for public awareness and action to preserve democratic values against these escalating threats.

• Kreig highlights “lawfare” as using legal tactics to attack political adversaries, pointing to cases like Michael Sussmann’s as examples of this dangerous trend.

• The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 proposes policies that threaten to expand conservative power, restrict immigrants’ rights, and diminish government accountability.

• He warns that Project 2025 will lead to an authoritarian regime with unchecked power, especially concerning deportations and widespread policing.

• Kreig warns that the current conservative Supreme Court could endorse these policies, undermining judicial independence and basic civil liberties.

• He urges people to vote and engage actively in politics to defend democracy, as Project 2025 will severely restrict freedoms if implemented.

Andrew Kreig’s analysis is a clarion call for all who value justice and democracy to oppose Project 2025’s authoritarian vision. By revealing the conservative agenda to weaponize legal systems against political rivals and restrict rights, Kreig shows how vital it is for progressives to stand united, vote, and advocate for true democratic freedom. His insights warn of a bleak future where authoritarianism could threaten the freedoms many take for granted, making immediate civic action essential.

In a recent episode of Politics Done Right, Andrew Kreig, editor of the Justice Integrity Project, elucidated the dangers posed by emerging legal strategies and conservative policy frameworks such as Project 2025. Hosted by Egberto Willies, this conversation sheds light on the implications of ‘lawfare’—the weaponization of legal processes against political opponents—and the radical agenda encapsulated by Project 2025. Kreig, a seasoned journalist, and attorney, warns that these tactics and policies if left unchecked, could fundamentally erode democratic freedoms, further entrench injustice, and ultimately harm the average American citizen.

In this interview, Kreig uses his career experience covering federal courts and working with Connecticut’s oldest newspaper, The Hartford Courant, to contextualize how far the current justice system has deviated from the ethos he once observed. At its core, Kreig contends that the misuse of prosecutorial power represents a grave threat to democracy, citing cases where questionable legal tactics have been employed to damage reputations and impede political adversaries. He refers to his book, The Complete Annotated Durham Russiagate Report, as a response to what he perceives as widespread misconduct and attempts to cover up the implications of foreign interference in American politics.

The so-called ‘lawfare’ approach leverages legal action as a political weapon. Kreig recounts how those who dared to expose foreign meddling in U.S. elections often found themselves under investigation rather than supported. For instance, he references Michael Sussmann, an attorney involved in the 2016 Clinton campaign, who informed the FBI of potential Russian interference, only to face charges for his disclosure later. Although Sussmann was acquitted, Kreig argues the intent behind the charges was clear: to discredit anyone willing to challenge the dominant political narrative. He explains that this approach extends beyond individual cases, emphasizing politically motivated prosecutions, often amplified by conservative media outlets eager to bolster narratives favorable to their ideological aims. While mainstream media outlets may cover these cases, they frequently fail to critically examine them, leaving viewers with a biased or incomplete understanding of events.

Kreig’s analysis also highlights how Project 2025 could represent the subsequent significant escalation in conservative legal strategy. Developed by the Heritage Foundation, Project 2025 is a blueprint for the next conservative administration, intending to reshape the federal government radically. Kreig notes that Project 2025’s proposals extend well beyond conservative principles, advocating for policies that undermine judicial independence, restrict immigrant rights, and dismantle critical government agencies. These policies, he argues, have the potential to fundamentally alter the fabric of American democracy and restrict the rights and freedoms of marginalized groups, particularly immigrants and political dissidents.

One of Kreig’s primary concerns with Project 2025 is its focus on immigration policy, which he views as a pretext for a broader authoritarian agenda. He references historian Timothy Snyder, who has warned of the authoritarian tendencies inherent in mass deportation policies. If implemented, Project 2025’s proposals could lead to a police state where local authorities would be empowered to detain and deport individuals deemed undesirable, potentially without due process or oversight. This approach not only violates fundamental human rights but also establishes a dangerous precedent for the treatment of American citizens who dissent from the ruling political ideology.

Moreover, Kreig underscores the threat posed by a Supreme Court aligned with these authoritarian policies. He describes the judiciary’s conservative majority as a potential rubber stamp for authoritarian actions, citing recent decisions that have expanded executive power while undermining individual liberties. If the judiciary continues to lean in this direction, Project 2025’s agenda could be unchallenged, rendering democratic checks and balances meaningless. Kreig warns that if Trump or a similarly authoritarian candidate wins in 2024, they could appoint additional justices sympathetic to this agenda, cementing conservative dominance in the judiciary for decades to come.

Kreig’s concerns extend to how these developments will affect ordinary citizens, particularly those from marginalized communities. He contends that Project 2025’s policies would disproportionately impact people of color, immigrants, and those with progressive political views. By targeting these groups, Kreig argues, conservatives are attempting to consolidate power by disenfranchising potential opposition, creating a political environment where dissent is effectively criminalized. This tactic not only undermines democratic principles but also alienates large segments of the population, making it difficult to achieve meaningful social change.

The conversation then shifts to Kreig’s efforts to expose these injustices. He recounts how he has attempted to alert mainstream media outlets to the dangers of politically motivated prosecutions, only to be met with indifference or outright dismissal. He suggests that this reluctance to engage with controversial topics is indicative of a broader issue within American journalism, where financial constraints and corporate interests often dictate editorial decisions. As a result, essential stories that challenge the status quo are frequently overlooked, leaving the public uninformed about the true nature of political developments.

Kreig concludes by urging listeners to take action. He emphasizes the importance of voting, not just as a civic duty but as a means of safeguarding personal freedoms and preventing the rise of authoritarianism. In his view, progressive activists and ordinary citizens must recognize the stakes of the upcoming elections and work together to prevent the implementation of policies that could dismantle the democratic institutions that protect individual rights.

In sum, Kreig’s interview with Egberto Willies shows the dangers of unchecked power and the importance of vigilance in preserving democratic values. His insights into ‘lawfare’ and Project 2025 reveal the extent to which conservative forces are willing to consolidate their influence and reshape America in their image. Kreig’s message is clear for progressives and anyone committed to justice: now is the time to act, lest we find ourselves in a society where dissent is punished, and democracy is a distant memory.

---

Viewers are encouraged to subscribe and join the conversation for more insightful commentary and to support progressive messages. Together, we can populate the internet with progressive messages that represent the true aspirations of most Americans.

---

Can we count on your help to reach our goal of 300 needed new paid subscriptions by the end of the month?

The other side has big donors and everyday citizens who invest heavily in platforms that lie and misinform. All we have is you. So, please invest in our media outlet by clicking the subscribe button below to become a paid subscriber. You won’t miss that coffee, but it will make a difference in our politics as we spread the truth about our policies and progressive politics. All paid subscribers get to read my five books on this platform and all subsequent books I write. They will also be privy to subsequent incentives.