Hershey’s Chocolate Substitute Exposes Capitalism’s Global Theft Of Cocoa And Labor
Hershey’s cocoa cuts expose a global theft machine where farmers, miners, and workers create wealth while Western corporations capture the profit.
Summary
Capitalism did not earn this wealth. It extracted it.
Hershey’s move toward chocolate substitutes exposes a much larger global scam: Western corporations rely on cocoa, coffee, bananas, cobalt, lithium, and other raw materials from Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean, yet the workers and nations that produce those resources capture only a tiny fraction of the final wealth. Farmers grow the cocoa, miners extract the cobalt, and workers move the global economy, but corporations in rich countries brand, price, and profit from their labor. This is not merely unfair trade. It is a capitalist structure that turns natural wealth in the Global South into corporate profit in the West while leaving producer nations poor, dependent, and underdeveloped.
Cocoa farmers in Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire produce the essential ingredient in chocolate, yet they receive only a small share of the final value while chocolate corporations generate massive revenues.
Coffee, bananas, and other agricultural products follow the same pattern: farmers receive pennies or a few dollars while Western markets sell finished products at enormous markups.
Congo’s cobalt and South America’s lithium show that the green-tech economy risks repeating colonial extraction by taking minerals from poor communities while corporations capture the technological premium.
France’s historic and ongoing monetary influence through the CFA franc system illustrates how former colonial powers preserved economic control even after political independence.
The capitalist system disguises extraction as efficiency, but it enriches owners, shareholders, and brands by underpaying the people and countries that create the real value.
The point is simple and morally unavoidable: these corporations did not “earn” this wealth in any honest sense. They captured it through unequal power, rigged trade structures, suppressed producer prices, and colonial economic legacies. Justice requires producer nations to retain more value, process their own resources, protect their workers, and end a global order that turns their abundance into someone else’s profit.
Premium Content (Complimentary)
Working title: The Chocolate Scam Is Bigger Than Hershey: Capitalism’s Global Theft Machine
Let’s start with a candy bar, because sometimes a candy bar tells the whole ugly story. Hershey, one of the most recognizable names in American chocolate, faced backlash after reports that some Reese’s and Hershey-related products used “chocolatey” or compound coatings with little real cocoa, a move tied to the explosion in cocoa prices. Reuters reported that cocoa futures fell sharply from late-2024 records, and that Hershey said it would raise cocoa content in some chocolate alternatives; The Guardian reported that some seasonal products had coatings made largely from sugar and vegetable oil, with less than 2% cocoa in one criticized Reese’s product.
That is the immediate consumer story. But the real story is bigger than a wrapper. The real story starts in West Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean. It starts with the farmer, the miner, the field worker, and the factory worker. It starts with people who do the work, touch the soil, risk their bodies, and produce the real thing. Then capitalism shows up with a contract, a commodity exchange, a patent, a brand name, a hedge fund, and a boardroom. It buys low, sells high, and then calls the difference “genius.”
But that is not genius. That is extraction.
Cocoa gives us the cleanest example. Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana dominate global cocoa production, and West Africa supplies most of the world’s cocoa. Yet the chocolate wealth does not remain where the cocoa grows. Corporate Accountability Lab reported that chocolate companies brought in $206 billion in revenue in 2022 and projected the industry could reach $263 billion by 2030, while cocoa farmers often earned far below the World Bank’s extreme poverty threshold.
Think about that. The crop generates hundreds of billions of dollars downstream. But the person growing it often cannot live a decent life upstream. The farmer plants the tree. The farmer fights the disease. The farmer faces drought, floods, climate stress, and volatile prices. The farmer watches a child go without. Then the corporate world takes the bean, wraps it in branding, shelf placement, advertising, and Wall Street expectations, and declares itself the wealth creator.
No. The wealth creator is the worker. The wealth extractor is the capitalist structure.
The value-chain numbers make the moral crime plain. The World Economic Forum summarized research showing that cocoa farmers account for only about 6.6% of the final value of a sold chocolate product. Another cocoa value-chain study found that smallholder farmers’ share of the final chocolate price averages about 11% for dark chocolate and 7% for milk chocolate.
So when a consumer buys a chocolate bar, the farmer is not receiving anything close to the value created. That farmer receives the crumbs after the corporation, the processor, the distributor, the retailer, and the financial middlemen have eaten. That is not an accident. That is the design.
Now look at the price spread. Ghana cut its 2025/2026 farmgate cocoa price to about $3,580 per metric ton after global prices fell, according to Reuters. That is about $3.58 per kilogram of raw cocoa beans at the farmgate. Meanwhile, a Hershey 1.55-ounce chocolate bar sells in American retail channels at prices that can approach or exceed a dollar per bar depending on package and seller; Walmart listed a six-count pack of 1.55-ounce Hershey bars at $5.97 in one result, roughly 99.5 cents per bar, while another listing showed higher online pricing.
That comparison is not perfect because a chocolate bar includes sugar, milk, processing, shipping, packaging, labor, rent, and retail markup. But it shows the structure: raw cocoa leaves from poor countries are used as a cheap input, then return to the world as a premium-branded product. The poor country supplies the essence. The rich corporation captures the value.
And when cocoa prices rise, what does the corporation do? It does not say, “We must pay farmers more permanently and build a fair supply chain.” It says, “How do we protect margins?” Hershey raised prices in response to cocoa costs, and Axios reported in May 2026 that even after wholesale cocoa prices fell sharply from their peak, chocolate prices had not fallen by the same amount.
That is capitalism in miniature. When costs rise, consumers pay. When costs fall, corporations keep the spread. When farmers suffer, markets call it volatility. When shareholders benefit, executives call it discipline.
Hershey is not alone. Nestlé reported a 2025 gross profit of CHF 40.8 billion and a gross profit margin of 45.6%, even as it said higher coffee and cocoa prices hurt margins. That means the corporation still retained enormous pricing power and profit capacity while small farmers absorbed the insecurity of the commodity system.
Coffee tells the same story. The International Coffee Organization reported that its composite indicator price averaged 256.05 U.S. cents per pound in May 2026, following surges in prior years. A pound of green coffee beans can be priced in cents and dollars at the commodity level. But that same pound, once roasted, branded, packaged, brewed, and sold by the cup, becomes a river of retail revenue. A latte can sell for five, six, seven, or even nine dollars depending on size, location, and add-ons; recent reporting even noted public backlash over Starbucks’ defense of expensive orders as an “affordable premium experience.”
The coffee farmer does not capture that “premium experience.” The barista often fails to capture it, either. The landlord, the brand owner, the franchising structure, the executive suite, and the shareholder capture it. The worker creates the experience. Capital captures the surplus.
Bananas expose the same immorality in a fruit aisle. Ecuador is one of the world’s major banana exporters. Oxfam America noted that Ecuador’s legal minimum price was $3.35 for a 40-pound box at the time of its report, while some farmers reportedly received as little as 80 cents for the same-size box; fair-trade bananas could command $7.75. Now compare that with U.S. banana prices. Federal Reserve economic data showed bananas at around 67 cents per pound in the U.S. city average in 2026. Forty pounds at that retail price equals roughly $26.80. Even after transport and spoilage, the gap tells the story. The farmer may get cents. The market captures dollars.
This is why countries rich in soil remain poor. This is why nations rich in minerals remain dependent. It is not because their people lack intelligence. It is not because they lack discipline. It is not because they lack a work ethic. They work harder than the people who profit from them. They are poor because a global economic architecture extracts raw materials cheaply, blocks local value-added development, manipulates currencies and trade rules, and then lectures the exploited about “free markets.”
Now move from cocoa and bananas to minerals. The Democratic Republic of Congo sits at the center of the global battery economy. Reuters reported that Congo holds about 72% of global cobalt reserves and supplies over 74% of the market. Cobalt powers batteries in smartphones, laptops, and electric vehicles.
And yet Congo is not wealthy in proportion to its resources. The reason is simple: extraction without sovereignty does not create development. It creates dependency. The mine produces the mineral. The global corporation captures the technology premium. Apple’s 2025 Form 10-K reported a total gross margin of $195.2 billion and a total gross margin percentage of 46.9%. Apple did not mine the cobalt. Apple did not live beside the poisoned water. Apple did not send a child into an informal pit. Apple captured value through design, brand, software, supply chain control, and market power.
That does not mean engineers, designers, and retail workers do not create value. They do. But the capitalist claim that the owner deserves the vast surplus because the owner “earned it” collapses when one follows the chain back to the mine, the plantation, and the former colony. The owner sits atop a system built to underpay the many and overreward the few.
Lithium in South America shows the same pattern. Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile sit in the so-called lithium triangle, a region widely recognized as holding a major share of the world’s lithium resources. Human rights groups have warned that the scramble for lithium in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile threatens Indigenous peoples, rural communities, and fragile ecosystems. The green transition cannot become a greenwashed version of colonial extraction. A battery economy that sacrifices Indigenous water rights so wealthy consumers can feel virtuous is not justice. It is extraction with better marketing.
And then there is France.
One cannot discuss extraction without addressing how old empires reinvented themselves after formal colonialism. France’s relationship with its former African colonies remains one of the clearest examples. The CFA franc was created under French colonial rule and tied African monetary systems to France. Brookings explained that the French Treasury guaranteed convertibility under a fixed exchange rate regime that required CFA countries to deposit 50% of their reserves into accounts linked to France.
There has been reform, and we must be precise. France’s own diplomatic site says the West African CFA reform abolished the obligation to centralize exchange reserves in the French Treasury and removed France from the governance bodies of that arrangement. But that reform does not erase history, nor does it erase the broader reality of monetary dependency. The Central African CFA framework remains less reformed, and the older structure shows how monetary sovereignty can be constrained long after the colonial flag comes down.
So when people say France is a wealthy country because it is simply more productive, more civilized, or more disciplined, that is a sanitized fairy tale. France has talent. France has workers. France has industry. But France also benefited from the empire, forced monetary arrangements, access to resources, military influence, and unequal trade relations. The World Bank listed France’s GDP at about $3.16 trillion in 2024. A country does not build that kind of wealth in a vacuum. It builds it inside history. And France’s history includes the extraction of resources from Africa.
This is where the moral argument must be direct. Capitalism calls this trade. But when one side sets the rules, owns the ships, controls the currency, dominates the financing, writes the contracts, and captures the brand premium, that is not free exchange. That is structured theft.
It is implicit theft because it does not always look like a man with a gun. It looks like a futures contract. It looks like a currency peg. It looks like a licensing agreement. It looks like a supermarket purchase order. It looks like a supply-chain audit written by the same corporations that need low prices. It looks like a chocolate company is saying cocoa is too expensive, while farmers still cannot build generational wealth from growing cocoa.
The system tells the farmer: “Your bean is worth little.”
Then it tells the consumer: “Our brand is worth everything.”
That is the con.
The same Western corporations that preach efficiency depend on cheap Southern labor and resources. The same executives who celebrate innovation depend on miners in Congo, banana workers in Ecuador, cocoa farmers in Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire, coffee farmers in Colombia and Mexico, and garment workers across the Global South. The capitalist did not create the cocoa tree. The capitalist did not create the cobalt. The capitalist did not create the rain, the soil, the river, or the hands that harvest. The capitalist created a legal structure that lets ownership outrank labor.
That is why these countries remain poor even when they should be rich. A country can sit on gold, oil, cobalt, lithium, copper, coffee, cocoa, bananas, bauxite, and timber, and still be impoverished if the value leaves before it circulates among its people. A country does not become rich by exporting raw materials forever. It becomes rich when it processes, manufactures, finances, brands, taxes, and governs those resources for public purpose.
That is exactly what rich countries did for themselves. They protected industries. They subsidized infrastructure. They used public money to build technology. They enforced trade rules when it helped them and ignored them when it did not. Then, after climbing the ladder, they told poor countries to stop using ladders.
The answer is not charity. Charity is what exploiters offer after they have taken too much. The answer is justice.
Justice means commodity-producing countries must retain more value at home. Cocoa-producing countries should process more cocoa into cocoa butter, cocoa powder, cocoa liquor, and finished chocolate. Coffee-producing countries should roast, package, brand, and export finished goods. Mineral-rich countries should demand refining, battery production, labor protections, environmental repair, and real royalties. Banana-producing countries should enforce living wages and punish buyers that race to the bottom.
Justice means consumers in wealthy countries must stop believing low prices are harmless. A cheap chocolate substitute is not just a consumer inconvenience. It is a signal from a system that would rather dilute the product than fairly share wealth with the people who make the product possible. A cheap banana may hide an underpaid farmer. A premium smartphone may hide a poisoned community. A $7 latte may hide a coffee farmer who still cannot afford the future that the brand sells in its ads.
Justice also means governments must act. Voluntary corporate responsibility is not enough. Corporations have had decades to prove they can self-regulate. They failed. They failed on cocoa poverty. They failed on child labor risk. They failed on living wages. They failed in environmental destruction. They failed because the incentive structure rewards failure when failure is profitable.
The public must demand rules: fair minimum producer prices, enforceable living-income standards, binding human rights due diligence, anti-monopoly enforcement, debt relief, technology transfer, local processing, and monetary sovereignty. Countries that produce the world’s wealth must no longer be forced to beg for development loans from the very powers that extracted their wealth.
And here is the closing point. When a corporation substitutes fake chocolate for real chocolate because real cocoa threatens its margins, it accidentally tells the truth. It tells us that the brand was never about honoring the farmer. It was about controlling the consumer and protecting the shareholder. It tells us that capitalism will cheapen the product, squeeze the worker, confuse the buyer, and preserve the profit.
The moral response is not complicated. Pay the farmer. Pay the miner. Pay the worker. Let producing countries own the next step in the value chain. Stop pretending that wealth captured through unequal power was earned by merit. It was not.
The candy bar is not just candy. It is a receipt. And that receipt shows who grew the wealth, who stole the wealth, and who has been told to be grateful for the crumbs.
PLEASE BECOME A PAID SUBSCRIBER TODAY
Countering billionaires—and soon trillionaires—is hard, probing work. They flood the zone with propaganda, policy distortions, and economic fallacies rooted in the Powell Memo and financed by concentrated wealth. We work every day to answer that machinery with truth, context, and critical thinking. But independent media cannot survive on conviction alone. It needs support from people who understand the stakes. Please become a paid subscriber today. Your support keeps this work alive, expands its reach, and helps build a media ecosystem that serves people, not plutocrats. This is not charity. It is an investment in truth, democracy, and the public good.
