Jasmine Crockett nails it: The idea that Chuck Schumer is the only one with a brain is ridiculous.
Jasmine Crockett pointed out that Chuck Schumer is not smarter than most Democrats opposing Trump's CR. She, like many Democrats, supports a Schumer ouster.
Paid subscribers help us flood the zone with the truth!
We are grateful for our Paid Subscribers and Free Subscribers. Misinformation funded by the deep pockets of our Oligarchy floods the internet. We are using all our platforms on-air, online, and in publications to counter that. You will be supporting much more than a newsletter; it is an entire progressive platform to reach people on every platform and demographic. Please invest the equivalent of less than a coffee to ensure we can keep doing this effectively. You get premium content, our books, & more!
Infantile Elon Musk melts on Fox News.
Summary
In a passionate critique, Rep. Jasmine Crockett calls out Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer for his sudden reversal in supporting a continuing resolution that benefits Wall Street at the expense of working people. She argues that Schumer’s belief that he alone understands the best course of action is absurd, given that most House and Senate Democrats opposed the measure. Crockett emphasizes that Democrats are actively defending democracy, challenging illegal Republican actions in court, and fighting for the American people. Clearly, Schumer’s position shift was motivated by financial markets rather than genuine concern for the country. Ultimately, she calls for new Democratic leadership prioritizing people over corporate interests.
Key Takeaways:
Schumer’s Arrogance: His belief that only he understands the best course of action dismisses the voices of over 200 House and Senate Democrats.
Progressives Hold the Line: Progressive Democrats—not centrists—are actively resisting Republican overreach and protecting democracy in the courts.
Wall Street Over Workers: Schumer’s shift in position appears to be more about stabilizing financial markets than serving the interests of the American people.
Corporate Influence in Politics: This episode highlights the ongoing battle between the progressive movement and the corporate establishment within the Democratic Party.
Call for New Leadership: Crockett argues that Schumer should step aside in favor of leadership that prioritizes working-class Americans over financial elites.
Progressive Perspective
Jasmine Crockett’s critique lays bare the fundamental problem with Democratic leadership: too many so-called “pragmatic” politicians are more concerned with appeasing Wall Street than standing up for working people. While progressives continue to win crucial legal battles and fight for economic justice, centrists like Schumer keep selling out their base to protect corporate interests. The future of the Democratic Party—and the country—depends on leaders willing to challenge the status quo and fight unapologetically for the people—ultra-wealthy as problem-solvers. The progressive path forward lies not in trusting self-serving billionaires but in prioritizing policies that promote equity, competence, and collective prosperity over individual greed.
Premium Content (Complimentary)
The American people are tired of political doublespeak and the prioritization of corporate interests over the needs of working families. In the latest budgetary battle, House Democrat Jasmine Crockett powerfully called out Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer for his abrupt about-face on a continuing resolution that many progressive Democrats opposed. Her critique was more than just a rebuke of Schumer’s decision-making—it was an indictment of a political system that continually bends to Wall Street at the expense of the working class.
Schumer, who initially opposed the resolution, suddenly shifted course and backed it, claiming that the alternative—following the path set by House Democrats—would have led to worse consequences. However, as Crockett points out, this argument doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. The vast majority of House Democrats opposed the resolution, along with a significant majority of Senate Democrats. The idea that Schumer alone had the wisdom to understand the “right” course of action is arrogant and disingenuous.
The Democratic Divide: Progressives vs. Corporate Interests
The fundamental conflict within the Democratic Party has long been a struggle between the establishment’s pro-corporate tendencies and the progressive wing’s commitment to working people. Crockett’s critique of Schumer is emblematic of this tension. Progressives have been at the forefront of fighting for economic justice, social equity, and government accountability. At the same time, centrists like Schumer often frame their compromises as pragmatism when, in reality, they serve entrenched financial interests.
Schumer’s decision to support the resolution was not about avoiding economic disaster but protecting Wall Street. His reversal was likely motivated by the financial sector’s concerns about market stability. If the budget were not passed, financial markets would face increased volatility, something Wall Street abhors. Rather than standing with working families struggling with inflation, job instability, and rising costs, Schumer chose to safeguard the interests of corporate America.
The Role of Progressives in Protecting Democracy
Crockett’s comments also highlight an important truth: Progressives hold the line against an increasingly lawless Republican administration. While Schumer and other Democratic centrists claim they are acting in the best interests of the country, it is progressive Democrats who are taking real action to push back against Republican overreach. Democratic attorneys general and governors are successfully challenging the administration’s illegal policies in court, proving that legal resistance is an effective tool in the fight for democracy.
Yet, mainstream media often downplays these victories, failing to credit progressives for their efforts. The dominant narrative still centers around establishment Democrats like Schumer, despite their failures to meaningfully challenge corporate dominance or push for bold policy changes. Crockett is right to call this out, emphasizing that progressives—not Schumer and his corporate allies—are working to protect American democracy.
The Need for New Leadership
Schumer’s capitulation on this issue raises a broader question about Democratic leadership. If he is willing to prioritize Wall Street over working Americans, can he truly be trusted to lead the party in the Senate? Crockett suggests it may be time for Schumer to go, and she’s not alone in that assessment. Many progressives have long argued that the Democratic Party needs new leadership that reflects the values of the grassroots rather than the demands of corporate donors.
The challenge, of course, is finding a replacement. While there is no obvious successor, fresh leadership is needed. Someone who will fight for progressive policies, stand up to Wall Street, and refuse to back down in the face of Republican extremism must step forward. The future of the Democratic Party depends on leaders who are willing to prioritize people over profits and recognize that the status quo is no longer acceptable.
The Bigger Picture: A Progressive Path Forward
This fight over the budget is just one example of a broader struggle for the Democratic Party’s soul. Progressives have consistently championed policies that the majority of Americans support—universal healthcare, a living wage, climate action, and corporate accountability—while establishment Democrats often water down these proposals in the name of bipartisanship or financial stability.
Crockett’s fearless critique of Schumer is essential in this ongoing battle. It underscores the necessity of a Democratic Party that listens to its base rather than catering to corporate interests. The real question moving forward is whether the party will embrace this progressive vision or continue to cling to outdated strategies that have repeatedly failed to deliver real change.
Conclusion
Jasmine Crockett is right: Chuck Schumer is not the only one in the room with a brain, and his actions in this budget fight reveal where his true loyalties lie. The Democratic Party must recognize that its strength comes from its progressive base, not from appeasing Wall Street. Schumer and other establishment Democrats cannot see this reality. It is time for new leadership—leaders who will fight for working families, uphold democratic values, and refuse to bow to corporate pressure.
The progressive movement is not just the future of the Democratic Party but America’s future. The fight is far from over, but with bold leaders like Crockett willing to speak truth to power, there is hope that real change is on the horizon.
Thank you Egberto for this insightful essay about Rep Crockett's assessment of the Schumer problem. I wondered what Senator Schumer's reasoning could possibly be, even in the face of Nancy Pelosi's disappointment about his decision, and of course it was to placate Wall Street. He will pay a huge political price for going against the majority of the Democrats in Congress, and this will definitely tarnish his legacy.
Jasmine Crockett absolutely has the moral right to blast rightwing Dems in sheep's clothing. She walks the walk and always has. Others — your recent guest Donna Brazile, for instance — do NOT. Brazile's among the corrupt party leaders who put us where we are today. Thanks for spotlighting Crockett.