Thank you Sandra Dingler, Elwyn Hudson, Ane McIntyre, and many others for tuning into my live video! Join me for my next live video in the app.
Summary
The speaker argues that America’s corporate‑run media ecosystem keeps citizens distracted and ill‑informed, allowing economic oligarchy and right‑wing disinformation—from Trump’s tariff myths to fantasies of invading Canada—to go largely unchallenged; only a robust, people‑funded independent press can halt the nation’s democratic backslide.
Bread‑and‑circus syndrome: Cheap consumer goods and nonstop entertainment mask systemic economic decay.
Corporate choke‑hold on news: Drug, oil, and defense advertisers blunt tough coverage, muting criticism of profiteering.
Meet the Press is a cautionary tale. Kristen Welker’s softball interview allowed Trump to recycle lies about landslides, tariffs, and $1.98 gasoline.
Tariffs = hidden taxes: Import levies fall on U.S. consumers, shrink wages, and finance more giveaways to the wealthy.
Imperial daydreams normalized: Even the idea of invading Canada or Greenland passed as a “legitimate” discussion, echoing colonial logic.
Corporate media’s indulgence of authoritarian spin is not sloppy journalism but a structural feature of profit‑first news. Grass‑roots outlets, funded by small donors and guided by social‑justice values, must fill the gap and rebuild an information commons where facts, equity, and democratic accountability trump demagoguery.
Premium Content (Complimentary)
Donald Trump’s latest appearance on NBC’s Meet The Press showcased a perennial crisis in American journalism: the reflex to “both‑sides” even the most brazen falsehoods. During an hour‑long conversation, host Kristen Welker allowed Trump to repeat disinformation about tariffs, the 2024 election, and global economics, then did not discount the possibility of using U.S. troops to seize Canada or Greenland. The exchange demonstrated how legacy outlets continue to launder authoritarian talking points through the patina of credible reporting, leaving viewers less informed and more vulnerable to demagoguery.
First, consider tariffs. Trump falsely insisted that foreign governments “pay the tariff,” claiming the United States now rakes in billions daily. In reality, multiple fact‑checks and economic studies show that the costs land squarely on U.S. consumers and manufacturers. The Washington Post recently documented how his new 10‑to‑145 percent levies will drive up prices on everything from electronics to canned food, contradicting his revenue boasts. A May 2024 Peterson Institute analysis estimated that the China‑focused tariffs alone reduced household welfare by roughly 0.6 percent of GDP—about $1,300 per family—after accounting for retaliation. Even U.S. Customs data rebuts Trump’s fiction: in March, the government collected about $8.2 billion, or $263 million a day, not “two billion.” Yet Meet The Press let the exaggeration stand, muting the pocket‑book alarm bells that working‑class families deserve to hear. Progressive media would have pressed the point: tariffs function as regressive taxes that transfer wealth upward by raising consumer prices while funding tax cuts for corporations.
The interview next drifted into election denialism. Trump repeated his mantra of a “landslide” victory. Yet the program failed to confront him with the real numbers. Trump never achieved a national majority in any of his races. This omission matters because normalizing the “landslide” lie erodes faith in democracy and fuels voter‑suppression laws that disproportionately target communities of color.
Trump also painted a rosy picture of consumer prices, insisting that “eggs are cheaper than ever” and that gasoline hovers near $1.98. Reality bites harder: average U.S. gas prices are above $3.20 a gallon, and USDA data show that egg prices are roughly 40 percent higher than pre‑pandemic norms. Bloomberg’s March fact‑check dismantled the claim, citing Bureau of Labor Statistics figures showing a 23 percent grocery‑price increase since 2021. When disinformation on kitchen‑table economics goes unchallenged, working Americans are left with a distorted map of their budgets, and progressives lose the narrative battle over inflation relief measures like an expanded Child Tax Credit or antitrust action against food conglomerates.
Perhaps the most chilling segment arrived when Welker asked whether Trump would deploy U.S. troops if Canada or Greenland refused annexation. Rather than recoil at the notion of 21st‑century conquest, the question framed military aggression as a legitimate bargaining chip. Trump declared he would not “rule out” force in Greenland, citing its rare‑earth minerals, and mused that Canada “only works as a state.” The Guardian captured the international backlash to this proto‑colonial rhetoric, quoting Greenlandic officials who called the idea “an assault on sovereignty.” ABC News polling shows 86 percent of Americans reject annexing Canada, yet the mere airtime legitimizes imperial fantasies that echo Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. A responsible press would contextualize the violation of international law and highlight the human cost of such adventurism; instead, Meet The Press treated it like an eccentric real‑estate pitch.
Why does this pattern persist?
