The Hidden Link Between EV, Tariffs, Wind Energy, Greenland, Venezuela, and Oil Imperialism

The fight over EVs and renewables exposes how resource extraction still drives U.S. economic and foreign policy.

EV, Tariffs, Wind Energy, and more.

Podcasts (Video — Audio)

---

Summary

The throughline connecting EVs, wind power, Greenland, Venezuela, oil, and tariffs is not innovation or security—it is imperial resource control disguised as economic policy. This commentary exposes how tariffs on electric vehicles, hostility toward wind energy, renewed interest in Greenland, and relentless pressure on Venezuela all stem from the same political economy: protecting fossil-fuel dominance and corporate power while undermining democratic sovereignty at home and abroad. The rhetoric of “national security” and “free markets” collapses under scrutiny, revealing a system that abandons genuine capitalism’s promise of efficient resource allocation in favor of state-backed corporate favoritism and extraction.

• Tariffs on EVs contradict free-market logic while shielding a failing domestic auto sector.

• Wind energy is sabotaged not by science but by political allegiance to oil interests.

• Greenland’s strategic minerals make it a target of neo-colonial pressure.

• Venezuela’s punishment is about resources, not democracy or drugs.

• Corporate capitalism thrives on instability and imperial reach, not innovation.

When policy consistently blocks clean energy, provokes resource-rich nations, and props up legacy industries, the pattern becomes undeniable. This is not governance—it is imperial economics repackaged for domestic consumption.

---

Premium Content (Complimentary)

Independent progressive media like this stand between the public and the flood of disinformation pushed by the Right and by neoliberals. I show up every day to push truth on the airwaves, across the internet, interviewing experts, organizers, scholars, and everyday people whose stories and knowledge rarely make it into corporate media. I cannot scale this work alone. If you value strong, fact-based progressive media, you can make a real difference today. Your support keeps this platform independent, growing, and accessible to everyone who needs it. Please become a paid subscriber now and help build the media ecosystem America deserves.

---

The debate around electric vehicles, windmills, Greenland, Venezuela, oil, and tariffs often appears fragmented, as if each issue exists in its own policy silo. That illusion serves power well. When examined together, these issues reveal a coherent and troubling strategy rooted in protecting entrenched corporate interests—particularly fossil fuels—through coercion, misinformation, and state intervention.

Tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles offer the first clue. Classical capitalism argues for efficiency: if another country produces a superior product at lower cost, markets should reward that efficiency. Instead, punitive tariffs block affordable EVs while U.S. automakers scale back production. This is not a market correction; it is a market distortion. The private sector failed to invest aggressively in EVs when it had the chance, and now the state shields that failure rather than confronting it. That choice delays climate progress and leaves working families paying more for fewer options.

The same logic explains the hostility toward wind energy. Offshore wind projects—many led by Danish firms like Ørsted—represent large-scale threats to oil’s dominance. Claims that turbines threaten national security collapse under basic physics and radar science. Modern militaries already distinguish complex signal environments. What truly alarms fossil interests is that wind power reduces dependence on oil, shrinking profits and geopolitical leverage.

That fear also clarifies renewed fixation on Greenland. Greenland holds vast reserves of rare earth minerals essential for renewable energy and advanced electronics. Though self-governing under Denmark, Greenland faces external pressure framed as “strategic interest.” This echoes earlier imperial patterns: identify resources, question sovereignty, insert influence. The outrage from Danish and Greenlandic leaders reflects a fundamental truth—resource desire, not defense, drives this attention.

Venezuela fits squarely into the same pattern. The country sits atop some of the world’s largest oil reserves and significant mineral wealth. For decades, U.S. policy has punished Venezuela through sanctions, asset seizures, and maritime enforcement, all while claiming humanitarian concern. Yet countries like Norway demonstrate that public stewardship of resources can fund social welfare without economic collapse. Venezuela’s crime, in Washington’s eyes, was asserting sovereignty over its wealth rather than surrendering it to multinational corporations.

Oil companies themselves expose the contradiction. Firms like BP, once rebranded as forward-looking energy leaders, promised a transition. Those campaigns vanished once profits surged. Instead of reinvesting excess earnings into renewables, corporations doubled down on extraction, lobbying governments to block competitors like wind and EVs. This is not capitalism evolving—it is capitalism captured, capitalism by design.

At the center of these choices stands political leadership that embraces spectacle over strategy. Under Donald Trump, renewable projects halted on whim, tariffs replaced planning, and foreign policy blurred into open resource intimidation. Such instability undermines even the business community, which relies on regulatory certainty to invest and innovate. When policy shifts with personal bias, economies stagnate.

The common thread, then, is imperial protectionism: the use of state power to preserve corporate dominance while denying both citizens and other nations the benefits of technological and economic progress. Tariffs replace industrial policy. Sabotage replaces transition. Coercion replaces diplomacy. Democracy becomes collateral damage.

Progressive policy offers a different path—one rooted in public investment, energy democracy, international cooperation, and respect for sovereignty. Markets can function, but only when they serve people rather than empires. The future economy—clean, distributed, and equitable—will not emerge from fear-driven policy. It will emerge when voters demand leadership willing to break from extraction and embrace transition.